SuperbaKnowledge Demonstration release
Platforms
ENIT
Regulatory update

Wind-Assisted Propulsion Systems (WAPS)

WAPS can reduce propulsion power and fuel use in favourable conditions, but benefit depends on the ship, route, wind, arrangement and auxiliary loads and must be verified against a comparable baseline.

WAPSrotor sailwind propulsionCIIdecarbonization

Operational Explanation

Wind-Assisted Propulsion Systems include rotors, rigid or soft sails, suction sails and kites that provide part of the thrust. Performance depends on the ship, installation, route, wind, sea state, speed and operating strategy.

Supplier estimates or results from other ships are not guaranteed performance. The balance must include auxiliary demand, added resistance, unavailability, route deviations and comparable conditions. Any CII or cost effect follows only from verified results and the applicable methodology.

Regulatory Reference

MEPC.1/Circ.896 — EEDI/EEXI, innovative technologies; IMO — current MARPOL Annex VI methodologies. The guidance addresses WAPS in EEDI/EEXI calculation and verification; it does not establish a universal operational savings percentage. Installation safety approvals remain distinct from energy assessment.

Scope of Application

Newbuilds and retrofits for which ship type, route profile, wind conditions and operational constraints make the system technically assessable. Suitability and benefit must be demonstrated for the specific project.

Procedure / How to Complete It

  1. Define the baseline, metric and comparable conditions.
  2. Assess wind and route together with speed, stability, structure, visibility and cargo operations.
  3. Include auxiliary demand, resistance, availability and operating limits in the balance.
  4. Obtain applicable approvals and train the crew.
  5. Measure the result, normalize the data and review assumptions.

Practical Example

A bulk carrier assesses a rotor retrofit using its own route, checks stability and cargo operations, then compares normalized fuel use before and after installation including system loads. The documented result, rather than a commercial percentage, supports the business case.

What Typically Goes Wrong

Using a generic percentage without a baseline, ignoring loads and unavailability, or overlooking visibility, stability and port operations can overstate benefit and introduce operational risk.

Common Mistakes Mistake Library

MistakeConsequenceHow to avoid it
Saving transferred from another shipUnreliable business caseUse the ship’s own route, arrangement and baseline
Main-engine fuel considered aloneNet benefit overstatedInclude all loads and losses

What the PSCO Checks

Checks may address installation certification and condition, visibility, stability, operational safety, familiarization and record consistency where relevant. A PSCO does not apply a universal saving percentage.

Operational Tips

Preparation checklist

FAQ

How much fuel does WAPS save?
There is no universal percentage: it depends on the ship, route, conditions and system and must be verified on comparable data.
Can WAPS be retrofitted?
Yes, where feasibility, safety, approvals and operational constraints are verified for the ship.
Does WAPS automatically improve CII?
No. The effect depends on fuel use and verified data under the applicable methodology.

Related Topics

Last substantive revision of this page: 15 September 2026 · page fingerprint 1d8a49229e4b