SuperbaKnowledge Demonstration release
Platforms
ENIT
Regulatory update

Just Transition and the Social Impact of Decarbonization

The transition requires competence tied to the actual fuel, technology, role and arrangement: STCW.7/Circ.25, .26 and .27 provide interim guidance, while MJTTF frameworks remain non-mandatory resources.

Just Transitiondecarbonizationcrew trainingsocial impact

Operational Explanation

The energy transition changes tasks, hazards and competence when a ship adopts new fuels or technologies. Assessment must start from the actual arrangement, onboard roles and Company procedures. Assigning the same training path to every seafarer is not appropriate.

IMO issued STCW.7/Circ.25 as generic interim guidance and STCW.7/Circ.26 and STCW.7/Circ.27 for methanol and ammonia. Maritime Just Transition Task Force (MJTTF) frameworks can support planning, but are non-mandatory resources and do not replace STCW, flag requirements, specific training or onboard familiarization.

Regulatory Reference

IMO — STCW.7/Circ.25, .26, .27; IMO — training resources and MJTTF frameworks; ILO — social dialogue and retraining. The circulars are interim guidance; separately verify STCW, flag requirements and recognition of the training pathway. The cited MJTTF resources and ILO guidance do not introduce a new maritime certificate.

Scope of Application

Companies, ships and personnel involved in the transition. In addition to technical competence, consider access to retraining, worker consultation and impacts on roles. As an organizational measure, define training time, resources and responsibilities so the plan is more than a list of courses.

Procedure / How to Complete It

  1. Define the fuel, technology, arrangement and expected entry into service.
  2. Map duties, hazards, existing competence and gaps for each role.
  3. Identify applicable STCW, flag, class, maker and Company requirements.
  4. Use relevant IMO circulars and, as non-mandatory support, MJTTF frameworks.
  5. Deliver training, familiarization and drills; record results and review them.

Practical Example

A Company introducing a methanol-fuelled ship maps officers, ratings and bunkering duties separately, uses STCW.7/Circ.25 and .26 to structure the programme, and verifies competence on the actual arrangement and procedures before assignment.

What Typically Goes Wrong

A generic course covering every fuel without links to role and plant can miss actual hazards. Treating voluntary guidance as mandatory certification also creates unsupported requirements.

Common Mistakes Mistake Library

MistakeConsequenceHow to avoid it
Identical training for everyoneGaps in critical rolesMap duties, hazards and responsibility
MJTTF framework treated as lawUnsupported documentary requirementSeparate STCW and flag rules from non-mandatory guidance

What the PSCO Checks

Checks address certificates, familiarization and competence required by instruments applicable to the ship and fuel. An MJTTF framework does not by itself become a PSC requirement.

Operational Tips

Preparation checklist

FAQ

Are MJTTF frameworks mandatory?
No. They are non-mandatory resources and do not replace applicable requirements.
Which IMO circulars address training for new fuels?
STCW.7/Circ.25 provides generic guidance; STCW.7/Circ.26 and .27 address methanol and ammonia.
Does every crew member need the same training?
No. Content and level depend on duties, responsibility, hazards and arrangement.

Related Topics

Last substantive revision of this page: 15 September 2026 · page fingerprint a8911a692339